At this second, it may seem to you that everything is optimized or overclocked to you, and we, enthusiasts, have nothing else to do here, but it's not so. Now, the labeling of CPPC cores corresponded to reality, and SMU intelligently use cores with maximum energy efficiency in low threaded applications. Information about this nice architectural feature started to flicker at the time of the Cezanne codename processors announcement, although it existed already in the Renoir codename processors.Īlso, I can note that AMD managed to overcome weak single-core boost or single-core boost from cores that had mediocre silicon performance and fault tolerance. During the development of CTR, it was discovered that during the boost to all cores, each core gets its own individual portion of voltage depending on the individual silicon characteristics (FIT). To my surprise, there was no mention of active dLDO in the presentation slides at all. At the time of the release, this turned out to be a slightly different feature than the news says - individual voltage control for the cores is referred to as "Curve Optimization." I think some of you remember the news that Ryzen processors with the Zen 3 microarchitecture were given the ability to customize frequencies for cores individually. A new layout, significant architectural changes to the modules, and a more fine-tuned tech process that allows for 5GHz and sometimes even higher frequencies.Įverything the community asked for, the community finally got. In addition to all of the above, there was another event with a capital letter, which added to the pleasant worries and delayed the release of CTR 2.0: the long-awaited release of AMD processors with the Zen 3 microarchitecture. Then download the Cinebench R20 archive and extract the contents of the archive to the “CB20” folder (this folder is located inside the CTR folder).Download CTR and unpack the ZIP archive in a directory of your choice.I'll try this again after that and after i tune the memory again. I want to reinstall everything, because I have a year and half old windows 10 install, that was upgraded from windows 7 and it's showing it's age. Before this the best I could get with straight, 3600MzHz XMP, was around 124FPS. I don't know if this is from the bios or CPU tune-up, but I like it. I got 129fps average, with the standard XMP and zero extra memory tuning. The funny thing is that even the game was faster. I don't know if P2 will get better gaming scores. I saved and applied just P1 profile and that's the all core one. The Cinebench R20 jumped up about a thousand points and everything was running cooler. The tuning ran for about an hour and it settled at all core overclock with first CCX running at 4475Mhz and second at 4175Mhz, but much lower power than out of the box. I did the diagnostics and then let the app tune the CPU by itself. Before the Bios flash it was running at 3800Mhz and the timings were 16-16-16-32.Īnyway. The XMP timings for my kit are 16-16-16-36 3600Mhz. So this tests were done with straight up XMP at 3600Mhz. I flashed to a newer BIOS the day before, and i didn't have time to tune my memory back to 3800MHz. I gave it a shot, but it's not apples to apples comparation to my previous tests.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |